Built for higher education accessibility and procurement teams

Make accessibility evidence useful for every procurement decision.

Vendor accessibility reports describe claims that need careful evaluation. We assess the evidence, document risk and conformance, and provide a supervisor-approved recommendation your team can use for purchasing, remediation and renewal.

VPATs and ACRs · Accessibility statements · Procurement risk scoring · Vendor follow-up

Vendor evidence and a documented review connected to an institutional decision.
From the evidence in your inbox to a recommendation your team can act on.

Not just a scoreScope, evidence quality, usability impact and a documented remediation path.

Accountable professional reviewEvidence-based analysis, quality checks and supervisor approval before delivery.

Built for your workflowOne workspace for every vendor, every review and every renewal date.

Built around the work

Support the whole procurement conversation.

Accessibility work continues after a document arrives. Accessican connects the review with the people, decisions and vendor commitments that follow.

01 / Evidence

Understand what you received

Review product scope, testing methods, named assistive technologies, missing evidence and conflicting claims—even when no completed ACR is available.

02 / Judgment

Make the findings usable

Receive a structured review report and separate risk and conformance worksheet, with evidence references, distinct concerns and practical vendor questions.

03 / Follow-through

Keep the next step visible

Track institutional ownership, vendor responses, remediation, renewal dates and the next review. Record institutional decisions separately from service recommendations.

How we work together

A defined scope. A traceable review. Ongoing visibility.

  1. Submit and scope

    Tell us the product, the workflows involved and what evidence you already have. We confirm deliverables and turnaround before work starts.

  2. Review and clarify

    A reviewer checks the evidence against what it actually proves, documents every scoring judgment, and requests anything missing.

  3. Deliver and decide

    Your team gets the report and worksheet. Your authorized staff make the procurement call—conditions, alternatives or approval.

  4. Monitor what changes

    We track remediation, updated evidence, product changes and the next renewal so your team can see the next step.

An institution connects its evidence records, reviewer assessment and portfolio oversight through controlled workspace access.

Higher education, with access at the center

Turn Title II planning into an ongoing procurement practice.

Students need access to registration, learning, payments and campus services. Public colleges and universities must consider the ADA Title II web and mobile accessibility rule when acquiring and maintaining technology. We support that work through evidence review, scoped testing, vendor follow-up and portfolio oversight.

Our current default evaluation standard is WCAG 2.1 Level AA. Other standards can be agreed by request. As requirements change, we update the service methodology while keeping each review’s standard and scope identifiable.

Explore higher-education support

Spend less time rebuilding the same picture.

Keep vendor evidence, review history, ownership and renewal information in one workspace. An ongoing review partner can help your team handle fluctuating demand without repeatedly recreating records or staffing every review internally.

We agree a review allowance and additional-work process. Actual savings depend on your current staffing costs, review volume and product complexity; no fixed savings are promised.

Accessibility begins before purchase

Prevent accessibility debt before technology becomes a dependency.

When a college commits to a product before understanding its barriers, the work often shifts to accommodations, remediation and replacement after implementation. Accessican helps your team bring accessibility into the purchasing conversation early, then maintain a record of decisions and vendor commitments.

Start with a lightweight screening of available evidence. Follow with professional review, institutional risk evaluation, contract expectations and ongoing monitoring. Each stage has a purpose; a screening answer or vendor claim does not establish product conformance.

A partner, connected to your team

Keep institutional decisions with the institution.

Service reviewers document findings and recommendations. Your college or university retains procurement and risk-acceptance authority. Our recommendations support your institution’s own governance and decision-making.

Professional accessibility expertise, connected to your institution’s own teams.

Start a conversation