Understand what you received
Review product scope, testing methods, named assistive technologies, missing evidence and conflicting claims—even when no completed ACR is available.
Built for higher education accessibility and procurement teams
Vendor accessibility reports describe claims that need careful evaluation. We assess the evidence, document risk and conformance, and provide a supervisor-approved recommendation your team can use for purchasing, remediation and renewal.
VPATs and ACRs · Accessibility statements · Procurement risk scoring · Vendor follow-up
Not just a scoreScope, evidence quality, usability impact and a documented remediation path.
Accountable professional reviewEvidence-based analysis, quality checks and supervisor approval before delivery.
Built for your workflowOne workspace for every vendor, every review and every renewal date.
Built around the work
Accessibility work continues after a document arrives. Accessican connects the review with the people, decisions and vendor commitments that follow.
Review product scope, testing methods, named assistive technologies, missing evidence and conflicting claims—even when no completed ACR is available.
Receive a structured review report and separate risk and conformance worksheet, with evidence references, distinct concerns and practical vendor questions.
Track institutional ownership, vendor responses, remediation, renewal dates and the next review. Record institutional decisions separately from service recommendations.
How we work together
Tell us the product, the workflows involved and what evidence you already have. We confirm deliverables and turnaround before work starts.
A reviewer checks the evidence against what it actually proves, documents every scoring judgment, and requests anything missing.
Your team gets the report and worksheet. Your authorized staff make the procurement call—conditions, alternatives or approval.
We track remediation, updated evidence, product changes and the next renewal so your team can see the next step.
Higher education, with access at the center
Students need access to registration, learning, payments and campus services. Public colleges and universities must consider the ADA Title II web and mobile accessibility rule when acquiring and maintaining technology. We support that work through evidence review, scoped testing, vendor follow-up and portfolio oversight.
Our current default evaluation standard is WCAG 2.1 Level AA. Other standards can be agreed by request. As requirements change, we update the service methodology while keeping each review’s standard and scope identifiable.
Explore higher-education supportKeep vendor evidence, review history, ownership and renewal information in one workspace. An ongoing review partner can help your team handle fluctuating demand without repeatedly recreating records or staffing every review internally.
We agree a review allowance and additional-work process. Actual savings depend on your current staffing costs, review volume and product complexity; no fixed savings are promised.
Accessibility begins before purchase
When a college commits to a product before understanding its barriers, the work often shifts to accommodations, remediation and replacement after implementation. Accessican helps your team bring accessibility into the purchasing conversation early, then maintain a record of decisions and vendor commitments.
Start with a lightweight screening of available evidence. Follow with professional review, institutional risk evaluation, contract expectations and ongoing monitoring. Each stage has a purpose; a screening answer or vendor claim does not establish product conformance.
A partner, connected to your team
Service reviewers document findings and recommendations. Your college or university retains procurement and risk-acceptance authority. Our recommendations support your institution’s own governance and decision-making.
Professional accessibility expertise, connected to your institution’s own teams.
Start a conversation